Reflection: Why comments or explanations?
- Marketa Vernerova

- Apr 1, 2022
- 2 min read
Updated: Apr 3, 2022
No comment is required for this infographic. But you can guess what it is.

Criticism should be constructive. More constructive statements about the difference in expectations and facts cannot be provided.
It seems that the graphic expression of the popular #sociological or socio-economic theory of social #stratification, which explains the structure of society on the examples of fruit, should be more spatial. It seems that the division into the poor, the army, the clergy, the nobility and the ruler, or another division into states and castes, or classes, is insufficient. To date, the scientific description lacked a third dimension, which includes the interior of that fruit.
What led me to this conclusion? For example, the following experience: What could be more difficult to believe than that a retail chain uses for business purposes private ideas from a private computer, which were created during a study primarily for child educational purposes and personal development? With a subsequent attempt to poison this pedagogically educated person? Is it even possible? Yes, it is.
This theory seems to be the logical basis. Just as people are not just flat, so are our relationships not flat.
According to this #appledimensionaltheory, a new theory of stratification, It doesn't matter which social class you belong to. The clergy or scholars are not at the top but they cover with their work a gang of thieves and mobsters. In this way, they no longer keep a beautiful apple shell. Barren, non-reproducible society.
The angle of view of the course, changes. It depends on which side you are on. Whether on the side of value producers or thieves. The thief certainly doesn't consider himself rot or dirt. This is a natural way of survival for him. Not for fun or revenge. But as a professional activity. (Let us now ignore the detailed causes or reasons for such action.)
Still, maybe people should give more consideration to the value of things and the adequacy of action (not excluding thieves, because why should an intelligent person be left alone).
However, it looks as if a bag of air has the same #value as a bag of flour.
It's not just about theft.







Comments